Neptune was just as lovely in the morning light as I thought he would be. I’d figured the sky would make a nice backdrop for him.
I took several shots, naturally. The one below would be my favorite if it weren’t for the playground equipment in the lower left-hand corner. If you want a closer look, just click on any of these images and a bigger version will open.
As for the sunrise, I captured a bunch of sunrise images, too. Not every frame I captured is worthy of sharing.
None of my followers come to mind when I say this… people who routinely share every single frame they capture make me crazy.
It was quite cloudy that morning (Saturday, November 7). Clouds can be good and bad. Too many, and the sunlight is obscured. I like some clouds because I think it makes the sky more interesting.
I don’t always edit (aka PhotoShop) my pics beyond re-sizing before posting. With sunrises/sunsets over water or some other flat horizon, I usually have to. Because no matter how hard I try, I can almost never get the horizon level enough.
I mention editing, because it’s easy to make a good picture look better with image editing software, as shown below, using the same image as shown above, adjusted for light.
Sometimes, I’ll adjust for composition, too. Below is the same image again, cropped so the sun is in the right third of the frame and the reflection of the sun on the water is in the lower right-hand quadrant.
Why am I telling you this? So you’ll understand that when I say an image is straight out of camera or SOC, it means I think I and my camera have captured it perfectly. That’s not an easy feat.
The horizon isn’t horribly slanted, but it’s slanted enough that I notice.
Leveling makes a difference, doesn’t it? (Sorry if I have just cursed you with the needing to have a level-horizon thing.)
There’s a lot to think about when trying to get a good picture — composition, light, focus, level horizon, etc. — and leveling the horizon is the one I forget and/or fail at most often.
When using an automatic camera, the point at which you focus will determine the amount of light captured in your shot.
The wider focus in the above shot made the camera let in just enough light to capture the foreground detail, but still leave some blue in the sky.
In the images immediately above and below this paragraph, zooming in/focusing on the brightness of the sun meant the camera let less light in, which is why everything else is darker.
Achieving just the right balance takes practice and experimentation, too. The angle of the light is also important.
That shot would have been nicer with a slightly darker sky, but then you wouldn’t have been able to see my footprints in the sand. I can use PhotoShop to darken the sky a bit if I want.
All of the images shared thus far were captured on my point-and-shoot, i.e., automatic, camera. It has a variety of manual options, but I have yet to learn how to use them. I can be a lazy photographer at times.
The next few images were captured with my digital SLR camera (interchangeable lenses, easier-to-use manual settings, manual focus, etc.).
Playing with the light settings and using manual focus let me capture those wispy little clouds in front of the dark, background clouds.
In the SOC version, you can’t really see the sun’s rays like you can (subtly) in the below version, which I adjusted slightly for light.
Not surprisingly to me, I captured more shots worth sharing with the point-and-shoot than I did with the SLR. I’m out of practice. It takes thought to get the right light settings on that thing, and I am very rusty.
All of the pics would have been better had I thought about using the tripod. I did say I can be a lazy photographer…
I could’ve stayed longer to watch as the sky continued to change and capture more images, but I knew I’d gotten a few good ones. AND I had things to do.
It’s hard to pic a favorite, isn’t it?
Next up, some fun images captured in and around Virginia Beach.
